Mal wieder ein paar fundierte
Infos:
1)
Zitat von http://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/:
Die Klimakonferenz in Posen sah sich einer schweren Herausforderung gegenüber: Zu den 400 Wissenschaftlern, die sich bereits öffentlich am 22.12.2007 gegen die von IPCC und Al Gore verbreiteten Klimakatastrophenprognosen wendeten, haben sich in den letzten 12 Monaten weitere 250 hinzu gesellt.
Bis jetzt unterschrieben damit 650 Experten - fast alles Wissenschaftler, die sich tagtäglich mit dem Klima selbst oder seinen Auswirkungen beschäftigen - die Liste, die bei Senator James Inhofe - frisch wiedergewählt in den US Senat- ausliegt.
Es sind die besten Klimatologen der Welt dabei. Darunter der bekannte Paleogeologe Prof. Bob Carter (Bild rechts).
Und damit sind es
bereits 12 mal soviel, wie an dem letzten IPCC-Report für Entscheidungsträger mitgearbeitet haben (großzügig gezählt waren es dort um die 50 ).
Sie stehen den Thesen von IPCC und Al Gore ablehnend gegenüber. Der berüchtigte „Konsens” ist damit erneut als Lüge entlarvt.
Viele dieser 650 Wissenschaftler sind gegenwärtig oder früher an der Arbeit des IPCC beteiligt gewesen.
In dem 231 Seiten langen Bericht werden alle Gründe aufgezählt, warum das Klima sich unbeeinflußt vom Menschen entwickelt. Die aktuelle Liste finden Sie im Anhang.
Hier die beiden Berichte:
UN Blowback: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims (200
:
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=2674e64f-802a-23ad-490b-bd9faf4dcdb7
rfs schrieb:
U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007:
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport
Kleiner Auszug aus der Einleitung:
"This report lists the scientists by name, country of residence, and academic/institutional affiliation. It also features their own words, biographies, and weblinks to their peer reviewed studies, scientific analyses and original source materials as gathered directly from the scientists or from public statements, news outlets, and websites in 2007 and 2008.
The distinguished scientists featured in this new report
are experts in diverse fields, including: climatology; geology; biology; glaciology; biogeography; meteorology; oceanography; economics; chemistry; mathematics; environmental sciences; astrophysics, engineering; physics and paleoclimatology.
Some of those profiled have won Nobel Prizes for their outstanding contribution to their field of expertise and many shared a portion of the UN IPCC Nobel Peace Prize with Vice President Gore.
Additionally, these scientists hail from
prestigious institutions worldwide, including:
- Harvard University;
- NASA;
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
- National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
- UN IPCC
- Danish National Space Center
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Princeton University
- Environmental Protection Agency
- University of Pennsylvania
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem
- International Arctic Research Centre
- Pasteur Institute in Paris
- Belgian Weather Institute
- Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute
- University of Helsinki
- National Academy of Sciences of the U.S., France, and Russia
- University of Pretoria
- University of Notre Dame
- Abo Akademi University in Finland
- University of La Plata in Argentina
- Stockholm University
- Punjab University in India
- University of Melbourne
- Columbia University
- World Federation of Scientists
- University of London."
2) (weil es nochmal dazu passt)
rfs schrieb:
An Analysis of the Review of the IPCC 4AR WG I Report - Es besteht überhaupt kein Konsens!!!!:
http://mclean.ch/climate/IPCC_review_up ... alysis.pdf
"
Just 5 reviewers explicitly endorsed the chapter in which it was claimed that humans have a significant influence on climate
but not one of those 5 has impeccable credibility!"
3)
31072 amerikanische Wissenschaftler (darunter 9021 mit einem oder mehreren Doktortiteln) haben folgende Petition unterschrieben:
http://www.petitionproject.org/
Purpose of Petition (!):
"The purpose of the Petition Project
is to demonstrate that the claim of “settled science” and
an overwhelming “consensus” in favor of the hypothesis of human-caused global warming and consequent climatological damage is wrong. No such consensus or settled science exists. As indicated by the petition text and signatory list,
a very large number of American scientists reject this hypothesis.
These scientists are instead convinced that the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity and that government action on the basis of this hypothesis would unnecessarily and counterproductively damage both human prosperity and the natural environment of the Earth."
Qualifications of Signers:
http://www.petitionproject.org/gwdatabase/GWPP/Qualifications_Of_Signers.html
Auszug:
“
The current list of 31,072 petition signers includes 9,021 PhD; 6,961 MS; 2,240 MD and DVM; and 12,850 BS or equivalent academic degrees. Most of the MD and DVM signers also have underlying degrees in basic science.
All of the listed signers have formal educations in fields of specialization that suitably qualify them to evaluate the research data related to the petition statement.
Many of the signers currently work in climatological, meteorological, atmospheric, environmental, geophysical, astronomical, and biological fields directly involved in the climate change controversy. The Petition Project classifies petition signers on the basis of their formal academic training, as summarized below. Scientists often pursue specialized fields of endeavor that are different from their formal education, but their underlying training can be applied to any scientific field in which they become interested.
Outlined below are the numbers of Petition Project signatories, subdivided by educational specialties. These have been combined, as indicated, into seven categories.
1. Atmospheric, environmental, and Earth sciences includes 3,697 scientists trained in specialties directly related to the physical environment of the Earth and the past and current phenomena that affect that environment.
2. Computer and mathematical sciences includes 903 scientists trained in computer and mathematical methods. Since the human-caused global warming hypothesis rests entirely upon mathematical computer projections and not upon experimental observations, these sciences are especially important in evaluating this hypothesis.
3. Physics and aerospace sciences include 5,691 scientists trained in the fundamental physical and molecular properties of gases, liquids, and solids, which are essential to understanding the physical properties of the atmosphere and Earth.
4. Chemistry includes 4,796 scientists trained in the molecular interactions and behaviors of the substances of which the atmosphere and Earth are composed.
5. Biology and agriculture includes 2,924 scientists trained in the functional and environmental requirements of living things on the Earth.
6. Medicine includes 3,069 scientists trained in the functional and environmental requirements of human beings on the Earth.
7. Engineering and general science includes 9,992 scientists trained primarily in the many engineering specialties required to maintain modern civilization and the prosperity required for all human actions, including environmental programs.”
PS:
Nachtrag zum Thema Meerespiegel:
http://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/?WCMSGroup_4_3=6&WCMSGroup_6_3=1247&WCMSArticle_3_1247=447
